
Page under construction:
Since the Second World War, the principal legal definition of refugees
has been that incorporated into the 1951
United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and in its 1967 Protocol which extended the
Convention’s provisions to current refugees. The definition of refugees was
designed to meet the needs of individuals fleeing persecution in the post war
era. Although conditions have changed since this definition was developed, the
UN definition remains the single most widely used formulation for determining
refugee status today. The convention defines a refugee as:
“any person who, owing to a
well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons o race, religion,
nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is
outside the country of his nationality ad is unable or, owing to such fear,
unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country, or who, not
having a nationality ad being outside the country of his former habitual
residence, is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to return to it.”
Furthermore, the UN Convention provides a set of rights for refugees,
including the right of non-refoulement- that is, he right not to be forcibly
repatriated to the country of origin. Today 106 countries have ratified either
the 1951 Convention or the 1967 Protocol and the UN definition of refugee has
been incorporated into many nations’ law. Yet the definition has serious
shortcomings. ([1]
The definition excludes, those individuals who are displaced by violence
or warfare and who have no been singled out for individual persecution. The UNHCR Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for
Determining Refugee Status states that “an applicant must normally show he
individually fears persecution.”
A second group of people excluded from the UN definition of refugees
consists of those individuals who have been displaced or persecuted because of
violence, but who, for one reason or another, have not left their country of
origin.
A third group of people excludes refugees with other fleeing motives
such as serious environmental degradation
Unlike UNHCR, the ICRC (Red Cross and Red Crescent) does not base its
activities on the 1951 Convention or the 1967 Protocol, but rather on
international humanitarian law:
“It is the breakout of armed
conflict, whether international or otherwise, that gives rise to the
application of international humanitarian law (the Geneva Convention of 1949
and their Additional Protocols of 1977). It is of no importance whether the refugees to be protected have
crossed an international border because of well-founded fears of persecution or
by reason of armed conflict, or whether they have moved from one part of their
own country to another.”([2])
Regional refugee laws
The 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol are supplemented by a growing
body of regional laws dealing with refugees. Both in
In1969 the Organization of
African Unity (OAU) developed te (Addis Abeba) Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee
Problems in
“Every person who, owing to
external aggression, occupation, foreign domination, or events seriously
disturbing public order in either part of the whole of his country of origin or
nationality, is compelled to leave his place of habitual residence in order to
seek refuge in another place outside his country of origin or nationality.”
The OAU Convention reflects the reality of African refugee situation and
42 African governments are part to it.
While expanding the definition of refugee from that of the 1951
Convention, the OAU definition also excludes internally displaced persons
(IDP’s) and those uprooted by economic disaster.
Moreover, as Oloka-Onyango has shown, the OAU Convention sought to
balance refugee protection and the prevention of subversive activities
committed by refugees against their home states.([4])
In 1984, representatives of ten Latin American governments adopted
the Declaration of Cartagena which
incorporated a broader definition of refugee than that of the 1951 UN
Convention. Specifically, the Declaration defined as a refugee those who met
the UN criteria, but also those
“Who have fled their country
because their lives, safety or freedom have been threatened by generalized
violence, foreign aggression, internal conflicts, massive violations of human
rights or other circumstances which have seriously disturbed public order”. ([5])
This was a far-reaching definition, which went beyond the OAU definition
and “despite the 1984 Cartagena Declarations’ non-binding nature, Central
American nations accept it as a document confirming the legal rules of asylum
for the region”.[6]
Unites States
Nationals of nine countries have Temporary Protection
Status in the
(Migration News, Vol. 11, No3, July, 2004)
In 2001
For more information
see: http://www.immigration.govt.nz/migrant/stream/live/pacificaccess/#top
http://www.countrywatch.com/@school/as_wire.asp?vCOUNTRY=177&UID=1092820
If you have specific information about this region, please let us know.
Add: EVRM art 3 and 8
UNHCR, Convention Plus
Under construction
General
We always welcome suggestions…sent them to info@liser.org
[1] With special thanks to Elizabeth G.Ferris. For parts of this webpage we did use parts of her
publication “beyond borders, refugees, migrants and human rights in the
post-cold war era”, WCC publications,
[2] League of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies
and International Committee of the Red Cross, The Movement and Refugees,
[3] Treaty? Of Addis Abeba
form
[4] Joe Oloka-Oyango, “Human Rights, the OAU
Convention and the Refugee Crisis in
[5] Cartagena Declaration, section III.3 Refugees,
Dossier, Asylum and Protection in
[6] Eduardo Arboleda, “Refugee Definition in